Silent City is a journalist turned PI tale set in Miami, following the attempt of a drunken, washed up reporter trying to track down a colleague who’d been working on a big story for the crime desk. It’s one of those tales where just about every character, regardless of their role, is already a part of the lead character’s life, the trajectory and mystery of the story is telegraphed from a very long way out, and the tale is driven forward by plot devices. And the characters were a little too typeset and one-dimensional. The result is a derivative crime thriller, told through workman-like prose, which has a decent pace, intrigue and tension, but is wholly unbelievable yet predictable. It passed the time, but sparked little else.
Monday, August 31, 2020
Review of Silent City by Alex Segura (2016, Polis Books)
Saturday, August 29, 2020
You deserve each other
‘I don’t think he’ll ever ask me out.’
‘He will. Eventually.’
‘I’m just a friend to him.’
‘A friend he wants to do naughty things with.’
‘He’s never even hinted at naughty.’
‘He sees you naked most of the time,’ Sarah said.
‘What? No!’
‘He’s practically drooling.’
‘Stop! He doesn’t see me that way at all.’
‘Well, you see him that way, so what’re you going to do about it?’
‘Nothing. He has to make the first move.’
‘It’s the twenty-first century, Emma.’
‘I’ll die of shame.’
‘You won’t.’
‘I probably will.’
‘Well, one thing’s certain. You deserve each other.’
A drabble is a story of exactly 100 words.
Friday, August 28, 2020
Review of The Lost Man by Jane Harper (2018, Abacus)
Harper’s tale charts Nathan’s faltering investigation into his brother’s death, slowly revealing secrets and dark moments that shadow the Bright homestead. The telling is nicely evocative, with a strong sense of place, realistic rendering of ranch and family life, and tensions and social relations among an isolated, resilient community, and well-painted characters. The real strength of story is the tight crafting of plot, which is free of awkward or contrived plot devices; mixing reminisce and mystery it creates a slow burn sense of unease and intrigue, leading to an understated and satisfying denouement. The result is an engaging tale of a lost man wandering back towards redemption.
Tuesday, August 25, 2020
Review of A Philosophical Investigation by Philip Kerr (1992, G.P. Putnam)
Kerr spins the tale out through two intertwined threads, the first the tracking police investigation, the second reproducing the journal entries written by the killer. The procedural elements are inflected with philosophical musings related to crime and punishment, with Jake increasingly questioning the ethics of the criminal justice system. The second apes Wittgenstein’s style and ideas, setting out the logic and reasoning of the killer and reflecting on the crimes committed. The result is a police procedural thriller that is thoroughly saturated with ethical and normative reflection, sometimes to the point of drowning the procedural side of the story. The issues raised are thought-provoking, but at times they seem forced centre stage, especially through the use of Wittgenstein’s notebook, and the tale feels too clever for its own good. As a result, while I found many of the ideas underpinning the book interesting, and it was quite an engaging read, it seemed a little too contrived and stilted.
Saturday, August 22, 2020
Better than messing up?
‘Stop glancing over; go and ask her for a date,’ Tom said.
‘I can’t.’ Jack stirred his coffee.
‘Won’t, more like.’
‘We work in the same office.’
‘And?’
‘And me too.’
‘So, work romances are banned?’
‘Yes. I don’t know. I don’t want to make her feel … uncomfortable.’
‘It’s everyone else that’s uncomfortable, the pair of you doing that flirting not flirting thing.’
‘What?’
‘Sitting together, glances, shy smiles, small talk. It’s excruciating.’
‘You’re right, I’ll leave.’
‘Now you’re really talking nonsense. I’ll sound her out.’
‘That’s worse.’
‘You’re going to do nothing?’
‘Better than messing up.’
‘Is it?’
A drabble is a story of exactly 100 words.
Tuesday, August 18, 2020
Review of Bluebird, Bluebird by Attica Locke (2017, Mulholland)
Bluebird, Bluebird is a police procedural set in East Texas centered on the investigation of a pair of murders by Texas Ranger, Darren Mathews. Race, family and community are its central hooks, explored through the killing of a black lawyer and a white woman in a small, rural settlement, and the turmoil in Mathews own life. Mathews is battling a number of issues at work and home – a career being derailed, a marriage on the rocks, a guardian pushing for a career change, a dysfunctional mother, an obstructionist local sheriff, and drink. The murders in Lark are a chance to redeem his career, and also to potentially contribute to the ongoing investigation to Aryan Brotherhood operating in the state. But little goes well after his arrival in Lark. Racial tension is high, and a black ranger is unwelcome. Locke nicely balances Mathew’s personal life with the investigation of an intriguing mystery, using both to provide an insightful social commentary on institutionalised racism in the Deep South. The story is well paced, the prose evocative, and the there’s a couple of nice twists. A strong start to the series.
Saturday, August 15, 2020
If you could see the future
Jack downed the whisky.
‘What would you do if you could see the future?’
‘Find out that week’s lottery numbers.’ Greg refilled the glass.
‘But what if you were going to die?’
‘Then Gemma would be a rich widow.’
‘I’m being serious. What if you could foretell your own death?’
‘Then I’d change my future.’
‘How?’
‘By avoiding whatever kills me; steering clear of the place and activity.’
‘What if you can’t?’
‘Then you’re fucked. Relax; none of us know our future.’
‘I knew you’d say that.’
‘Déjà vu.’
‘I know a truck is about to plough through that wall.’
A drabble is a story of exactly 100 words.
Monday, August 10, 2020
Review of Infinite Detail by Tim Maughan (2019, FSG)
Infinite Detail tracks life before and after a catastrophic cyberattack that takes down the global internet and permanently disables every digital technology and system, following two threads, one set in Bristol, the other New York. In the time before and during the crash, the excesses of the global capitalism and technocratic governance in Bristol and New York is contrasted to the idealism of the Croft, a community that disconnects from the global internet, building its own communitarian network. In the time after, the folly of imploding the global system with no plan or bridge to maintain social systems is exposed, with the focus mostly on Bristol and the lives of a handful of the Croft’s inhabitants. Maughan nicely juxtaposes life before and after the crash, raising thoughtful questions and observations about a world becoming increasingly dependent on digital technologies to drive and control the global economy and state practices (and all the tech and systems discussed currently exist and are deployed rather than being speculative, though some are more embedded in the story than at present) and what happens if they are suddenly and permanently switched off. At the same time, the story relating to the Croft’s current and former inhabitants, and their own trials and memories, remains centre stage. The result is an engaging tale about our digital and surveillance present and future.
Saturday, August 8, 2020
There’s a difference between stupid in love and stupid
‘He’s in the shower then?’ Cathy asked, entering the kitchen.
‘Yeah.’
‘You don’t sound too happy about it.’
‘Well, y’know.’ Jane shrugged.
‘Well, I know I was kept up half the night.’
‘Sorry.’
‘What are you sorry for? Oh, god! Oh, god!’ Cathy mimicked. ‘Oohhhh, fuck. Don’t stop!’
‘Sorry.’
‘What is it, buyer’s remorse? Got a face like a slapped arse?’
‘Cath.’
‘At least it wasn’t that fucker Gary.’
‘Shhhssh. He might hear.’
‘Wait …’
‘I know.’
‘He cheated on you. Gave you a fucking black eye!’
‘I …’
‘Jesus, Jane! There’s a difference between stupid in love and stupid.’
A drabble is a story of exactly 100 words.
Friday, August 7, 2020
Review of One For The Money by Janet Evanovich (1994, Penguin)
One for the Money was the first book in the Stephanie Plum series, now at book 27. I first read it in 1996. It was a breath of fresh air at time – a tale that was breezy and humorous, laced with a dark streak, crossing a rom-com sensibility with violent crime. The juxtaposition of the fish-out-of-water former lingerie buyer working as a bounty hunter, the sparky relationship between Plum and Morelli as she chases him as he seeks to clear his name chasing witnesses and someone else chases them both, work well to produce an entertaining caper. Added to the mix is Stephanie’s exasperated family. Reading it again it’s still a good read, but it’s not quite as a I remember it, partly clouded by an expectation to spend more time with characters that are developed further in subsequent books (I got to about book 12 before giving up on the series, which at that point seemed to be rehashing the same story and had lost its spark). Nonetheless, it retains its freshness and sassiness. A fun read.