
I struggled with Frozen Out. It had all the plot and character ingredients to be a very good read, but somehow it failed to fully deliver. The principle problem for me was the credibility of the plot. There were too many things about the procedural elements and office politics of the police investigation and the political corruption and murders that I did not believe. This was not helped by the writing being quite flat and lifeless, the dialogue stilted, and the narrative long winded. There’s nothing wrong with workmanlike prose, but this could have done with a good edit to make it livelier and punchier. Gunnhildur is the novel's saving grace. She was an interesting character and has much potential for heading a series. I’d like to be a lot more positive, and the book has received more upbeat reviews elsewhere (e.g., at Eurocrime), but the book just didn’t click for me.

3 comments:
Rob - Thanks for your candid and thoughtful review. You highlight how very important credibility and writing style are to a novel. You also highlight how important a good characterisation can be. It sounds as though in this case, it's the one motivation you might have to read the next in this series.
These Scandinavian mysteries are starting to run together. Too many common elements. Angst, snow, Nazi-type people, village life, family secrets, drinking.
It will be interesting to see if I agree with you or other friend-feeders this time because I am definitely going to try this series. I met Quentin Bates at CrimeFest so I´ll give him a chance for being an interesting person to talk to ;)
Post a Comment